Differences between Hypothesis and Theory

From diff.wiki

Comparison Article[edit]

In scientific discourse, the terms hypothesis and theory carry distinct meanings, though they are often used interchangeably in common language.[1] A hypothesis is a proposed, testable explanation for an observed phenomenon, while a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.[2]

A hypothesis serves as a starting point for further investigation.[3] It is a provisional idea that requires evaluation.[1] For a hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning it's possible to design an experiment or observation that could prove it wrong.[4][5] Hypotheses are often specific and are typically based on prior knowledge and observation.[4] For example, a scientist might hypothesize that if a certain plant is exposed to more sunlight, it will grow taller. This is a specific prediction that can be tested through a controlled experiment.

A scientific theory, in contrast, is much broader in scope. It is an established and comprehensive explanation for a wide range of phenomena. Theories are supported by a vast body of evidence gathered from numerous experiments and observations. They often integrate and generalize many hypotheses. For instance, the theory of evolution by natural selection explains a wide variety of biological observations, from the fossil record to the genetic similarities between different species. It is a unifying framework that has been repeatedly confirmed.

The development of a scientific theory often begins with a hypothesis. If a hypothesis is repeatedly tested and supported by evidence from multiple independent researchers, it can become part of a larger theory or even develop into a theory itself.[1] This process can take many years and involves rigorous scrutiny by the scientific community. A theory is not simply a guess or a hunch; it is a reliable account of the real world based on extensive evidence.

Comparison Table[edit]

Category Hypothesis Theory
Definition A tentative and testable explanation for a specific phenomenon.[5] A well-substantiated, comprehensive explanation for a broad range of phenomena.
Scope Narrow and specific. Broad and general, often incorporating multiple hypotheses and laws.
Evidence Based on initial observations and background research; requires testing. Supported by a vast and continually growing body of evidence from repeated testing.
Status A provisional idea or an educated guess that is yet to be rigorously tested.[4] A well-established and widely accepted principle within the scientific community.
Purpose To provide a specific, testable prediction that can guide further research. To provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and explaining a major aspect of the natural world.
Example A plant's growth rate is affected by the color of the light it receives. The theory of general relativity, which explains gravity as a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.
Venn diagram for Differences between Hypothesis and Theory
Venn diagram comparing Differences between Hypothesis and Theory


It is a common misconception that theories evolve into laws. Scientific laws are descriptions of observed phenomena, often expressed as mathematical equations, but they do not explain why the phenomena occur. For example, the law of gravity describes the attraction between two objects, but it does not explain the underlying cause of this attraction, which is the domain of the theory of general relativity. Theories are the explanations, while laws are the descriptions.

References[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ref1
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ref2
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ref3
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ref4
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ref5